{"id":1768,"date":"2026-07-16T21:02:10","date_gmt":"2026-07-16T21:02:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/centauriweb.hu\/en\/?p=1768"},"modified":"2026-07-25T20:29:48","modified_gmt":"2026-07-25T20:29:48","slug":"where-does-biodiversity-matter-most-when-climate-extremes-intensify","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/centauriweb.hu\/en\/where-does-biodiversity-matter-most-when-climate-extremes-intensify\/","title":{"rendered":"Where does biodiversity matter most when climate extremes intensify?"},"content":{"rendered":"\n

Where does biodiversity matter most when climate extremes intensify? <\/em><\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n

A global synthesis of 75 biodiversity experiments shows that biodiversity most strongly reduces productivity losses under extreme drought in more\u2011dry grasslands, while forests do not exhibit the same context\u2011dependent pattern. The study was led by researchers at Yokohama National University and the German Centre for Integrative Biodiversity Research (iDiv), and published in Nature Ecology & Evolution.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Across ecosystems, biodiversity is known to support productivity. <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

What has been less clear is where biodiversity matters most when climate extremes intensify. With droughts and heatwaves becoming more frequent in many places, this question is central to climate adaptation and ecosystem management. The study addresses this gap by identifying where biodiversity most effectively supports ecosystems under extreme climatic conditions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cOur ultimate goal is to move away from a broad ecological insight to a practical basis for climate adaptation,\u201d explains Takehiro Sasaki, first author of the study from Yokohama National University.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The study brought together data from 75 long\u2011term biodiversity experiments carried out in grasslands and forests with different climates. For each site, the researchers linked long\u2011term weather records, like daily precipitation and maximum temperature, and site-level information like aridity \u2013 dryness \u2013 and soil data. The analysis assessed whether aridity and soil nutrient conditions influenced biodiversity effects during drought or extreme heat.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

They found that in more\u2011dry grasslands, <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

plant biodiversity had its strongest positive effect on productivity during years of extreme drought. <\/p>\n\n\n\n

This effect was driven mainly by stronger complementarity among species, meaning species either contributed in functionally distinct and\/or mutually supportive ways when water was scarce. In less\u2011dry grasslands, drought showed stronger selection effects meaning productivity relied more heavily on a few highly productive species.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

Forests did not show comparable context dependence under extreme drought, <\/h2>\n\n\n\n

although the authors emphasise that this does not mean that biodiversity is unimportant in forests. Other findings include that heat extremes did not produce clear context-dependent changes in biodiversity effects across ecosystem types or aridity gradients. Across both grasslands and forests, soil nutrient conditions did not detectably modify biodiversity effects under either drought or heat extremes. This suggests that water limitation may become a more important constraint on productivity than soil nutrient supply as climatic stress intensifies.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n

\u201cThis unprecedentedly comprehensive meta-study not only highlights the importance of biodiversity in buffering climate extremes, it also identifies the conditions under which we can expect the strongest biodiversity benefits\u201d, explains senior author Prof. Nico Eisenhauer, research group leader at iDiv and Leipzig University.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n

The researchers note that further exploration is needed to fully unpack the question of where biodiversity is going to make the biggest difference when climate extremes hit. In future, the researchers hope to improve their forest evidence by increasing the duration of studies, improving more sensitive indicators of drought for forest ecosystems, in addition to testing whether the effects of biodiversity are slower to emerge in forests than in grasslands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n

\n\n\n\n
\n
Montenegro identifies potential Natura 2000 areas<\/a><\/blockquote>